Ethics natural law on genetic engineering

Some writers use the term with such a broad meaning that any moral theory that is a version of moral realism — that is, any moral theory that holds that some positive moral claims are literally true for this conception of moral realism, see Sayre-McCord — counts as a natural law view. Some use it so narrowly that no moral theory that is not grounded in a very specific form of Aristotelian teleology could count as a natural law view. But there is a better way of proceeding, one that takes as its starting point the central role that the moral theorizing of Thomas Aquinas plays in the natural law tradition. Every introductory ethics anthology that includes material on natural law theory includes material by or about Aquinas; every encyclopedia article on natural law thought refers to Aquinas.

Ethics natural law on genetic engineering

Ethics natural law on genetic engineering

Biotechnology Biotechnology James Watson and the late Francis Crick discovered the structure of DNA in ; Watson has spoken in favour of genetic engineering Biotechnology isn't something new - selective breeding to create more useful varieties of animals and plants is a form of biotechnology that human beings have used for thousands of years.

Biotechnology includes any use of science or technology to alter the characteristics of a particular breed or animal. Biotechnology can be good or bad for animals - and it may also produce an answer to the ethical problems of experimenting on animals.

Transgenic animals raise a particularly difficult problem. Human problems Newspaper articles about the ethical problems of genetically engineered animals are usually concerned about the danger these animals may pose to human beings usually to human healthrather than any implications for the animals themselves.

Animal rights Genetic engineering and selective breeding appear to violate animal rights, because they involve manipulating animals for human ends as if the animals were nothing more than human property, rather than treating the animals as being of value in themselves.

Recent action to allow animals to be patented reinforces the idea of animals as human property, rather than beings in their own right. Animal welfare Biotechnology can be good for animals.

The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Selective breeding and genetic engineering can benefit animals in many ways: Improving resistance to disease Breeding to remove characteristics that cause injury eg selecting cattle without horns But biotechnology can also be bad for animals - the good effects for the breeder can offset by painful side-effects for the animals: Modern pigs have been bred to grow extra fast - some breeds now grow too fast for their hearts, causing discomfort when animals are too active Broiler chickens are bred to grow fast - some now grow too fast for their legs Regulating genetic engineering Profitability is one of the major drivers of both selective breeding and genetic engineering.

If animal welfare is not to be compromised, research must be restricted by a counter-balancing ethical principle that prevents altering animals in a way that was bad for the animal. One writer, Bernard Rollin, suggests that a suitable rule to regulate genetic engineering would be this: Genetically engineered animals should be no worse off than the parent stock would be if they were not so engineered.

This principle can easily be adapted to cover selective breeding. Biotechnology and experimental animals It's been suggested that genetic engineering may solve all the ethical problems of laboratory experiments on animals.

The goal is to create a genetically engineered mammal that lacks sentience, but is otherwise identical to normal experimental animals. Such an animal could not suffer whatever was done to it, so there should be no ethical difficulty in performing experiments on it. This argument seems convincing, but do you feel comfortable about it?

Is there any ethical objection to creating genetically engineered human beings without sentience, and experimenting on them?Jul 20,  · Ethics guide. Biotechnology Watson has spoken in favour of genetic engineering Biotechnology isn't something new - selective breeding to create more useful varieties of animals and plants is.

Genetic engineering is also called genetic modification or GM. It is the process of manually adding new DNA to an organism-the direct manipulation of an organism's genome using biotechnology. It is the process of manually adding new DNA to an organism-the direct manipulation of an organism's genome using biotechnology.

1) Genetic engineering is often judged as "unnatural" or said to "violate natural law": Genetic engineers are clearly messing with nature in ways never before possible. But there are many problems inherent in moral argument that appeal to natural law.

Natural law theory traditionally maintains the immutability of human nature, which contradicts modern biology.

Ethics natural law on genetic engineering

Furthermore, technology transforms human human nature. What happens when gene splicing, recombinant DNA, and genetic engineering become normal?

For various reasons then, natural law as traditionally conceived and modern science are at odds. Genetic engineering focuses on: Genetic engineering, or genetic modification, uses a variety of tools and techniques from biotechnology and bioengineering to modify an organism’s genetic makeup.

Science and Engineering Ethics Mallet, J., et al. Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary. The main principle of Natural Law is that anything that defies the purpose of what it is 'meant' to do, is immoral. The primary precepts of ‘continuation of the species through reproduction’ is also an argument often used to argue against genetic engineering.

BBC - Ethics - Animal ethics: Biotechnology